I am having some trouble thinking of parallel experiences in
which one experience was bad, and the other was good. I think that my experiences
have been much less distinctly tilted one way or another. I can much more
easily come up with aspects of my current job, for example, that I like, and
aspects that I dislike.
The post says to use aliases, so I’ll try to be vague
instead of giving specific names. I work at a bank in Champaign. When I started
the job this summer, the bank had just lost all two of its three previous
tellers. E (female) has been working at the bank part-time for over a year, B
(male) had been hired about a month before me to fill the full-time teller
position, and I was hired to fill the other part-time teller position.
I will start with an experience where things went poorly. Our
branch is open every day during the week, and just our drive-thru is open on
Saturdays. On Saturdays two people have to be at work, because we each only
receive half of the vault codes for security reasons, even though it only takes
one teller to run the drive-thru. On one of the Saturdays that I had been
assigned to work this summer, the other teller I was scheduled to be working with,
B, did not show up. I waited until 15 minutes after the drive-thru was supposed
to have opened at 8am, and then because the manager was out of town on
vacation, I called one of our branch loan officers. The bank’s CEO ended up
having to come in to help me get into the vault until the loan officer I had
called was able to get to the bank to sit there with me until the drive-thru
closed at noon.
B called into the bank at about 9:30 and said he had
forgotten to set an alarm, and the loan office had me tell him to just stay home
for the day. On top of not showing up on this Saturday, B had already called in
sick to work on five separate occasions that summer (several of those being on
a Friday). The loan officer spoke with me that morning about the situation, and
he was clearly angry that B had not shown up for work. The loan officer
mentioned that B had called in sick more days in the 2 1/2 months B had been
working at the bank than he had taken as vacation days all year, and said that
if the decision was up to him, he would fire B. Apparently the manager was
supposed to tell B not to come in on the following Monday, and so the loan
officer asked me if I could come in early that day.
B did show up for work on Monday though, and said that the
manager never told him not to come in. When K, the manager, got back from
vacation on Tuesday, he told me that I would have to work fewer hours later
that week because of the hours I came in early on Monday. He then told B that B
could work extra hours that week if he wanted to so that he could make up his
hours for “missing Saturday.” Unfortunately, the buddy-buddy system between B
and the manager K was not just noticeable on this day, but is evident most days
that I am at work. This is problem with a type of ‘clique’ feel happening at my
workplace. This incident also occurred because of B’s lack of commitment to
work. All-in-all, this situation is very frustrating because the other teller
and I frequently feel that we are treated unfairly.
I have had very good experience, though, working with the
other teller, E. We are both good about helping the other person when they get
busy as opposed to only working on ‘our work’. The way we are able to share
work fairly to get things accomplished makes both our work and personal
relationship go very smoothly. This has a lot to do with E’s personality,
because she is a very friendly and open person, which makes her easy to get
along with, and with her commitment to the work, because it causes her to care
about getting things done regardless of who’s ‘job’ it is to do the task.
Unfortunately cliques happen too often in the work place. I had a similar situation where a co-worker got special treatment because of his friendship with others in the organization. Do you think there are ways to eliminate these cliques?
ReplyDeleteThe way you explain the story, I am not sure of the hierarchy between the manager and the loan officer. If I were in that situation in the role of the loan office, I would not let things drop after being aware of the bad experience. I would make sure it was addressed at a management level. That doesn't mean the B would eventually be fired. But it does mean that the situation would be aired an resolved in some manner.
ReplyDeleteSince you do not report to the loan officer, it may not be his responsibility to let you know how things get resolved, but to leave them as you describe is bad for morale in the organization. It is surprising to me that he'd simply let it persist. Or is there more to the story than you've told here?
Our branch has two 'halves.' We have the deposits side, where the tellers work, and the loan side. The branch manager is in charge of the deposits side of the branch, so he is in charge of hiring, training, and managing the branch tellers in addition to running things associated with the typical bank deposit activities. I'm not completely sure how the hierarchy works between the branch manager and the loan officers; I believe that the loan offices actually report to whoever is in charge of the loan department of the whole bank (not just our branch). I know that in addition to the loan officer, other people higher up in the bank questioned the manager's decision to keep B on, however my understanding is that the manager had the ultimate say in that decision.
ReplyDeleteI agree that this has led to bad moral. There are often situations in which the other teller and I feel that we put in more effort and do 'better' work than B does, however the manager still shows favoritism towards B.